I disagree with the lady in
England that the James
Woods in
Iowa is the James
Woods born in
Potton - this is the birth you found in Biggleswade registration district, and the illegitimate birth in
Potton that I referred to earlier. He was the illegitimate son of Rebecca, and was living in
Potton in 1851 aged 3. By the 1861 census his mother had married Henry Gilbert and James
Woods age 13 was living with them in
PottonI can't find him in 1871
In 1881 in East
Ham London is James
Woods 32 born
Potton with wife Mary Ann 30 born Biggleswade and four children aged 11 to 10 months, the eldest three being born at Biggleswade
In 1891 still living in East
Ham was James Wood 42 b
Potton plus family; and in 1901 still in East
Ham James
Woods 52 b
PottonThere are no other James Wood(s) baptised in
Potton around 1848/9, nor are there are any other James Wood(s) births registered at that time on the GRO index. There are no other James Wood(s) born in, or living in,
Potton in either the 1851 or 1861 censuses
I think it therefore reasonable to assume that the James in East
Ham is the same person as the James, illegitimate son of Rebecca, living in
Potton in 1851-61. As he was having children in Biggleswade starting c1870 he couldn't have been the James
Woods you've found in
Iowa in 1870, 1880 and 1885.
You need his marriage certificate to get his father's name.
David