I am of Royal descent, from both my parents blood lines....
Replies: 3
Re: I am of Royal descent, from both my parents blood lines....
|
|
Posted: 29 Jun 2008 2:10PM GMT |
Classification: Query
Surnames: Breheny, Briwere, Briennies, Brewers, Baose, Brusters, Brewsters
Lily if I were you I would not try to debate the point of being descended from Royal Ancestorial Bloodlines, either your ancestors survived or they did not.
What makes me frustrated with people like you, is the fact that most ROYALS did live the good life, deciding whom lived and whom died in their royal courts throughout most of Western Europe right from about the 900ADs right up to the 16th Century, with their Royal COUSINS being tarnished and then chased out of the Kingdom for being cousins to them, my ancestors is a case in point, you better get ready for a whole lot of people to scoff at you.
I am sorry to be rude, Lily but your points are pretty moot at this era where the rich are getting richer at our expense and people like me that have come from such bloodlines that I have are stuck in living day to day without our bloodines understood and much less cared about, by your very words you are saying between the lines that you are not improverished nor are you wanting much for money so get off that highhorse of yours.
Oh you don't tell them, well you sure got a strange way of keeping your bloodlines secret by comming on here and telling everyone your royal descended? I have a reason for myself telling others that I can prove my bloodlines, it is for the very fact that my ancestors were always the ones cleaning up the messes in politics and wars, also society problems that the royals left where they expected their royal cousins to act as chambermaids. Yet this gets you into another kettle of fish I think.....Royal Nobility in many eras were VERY HARSH on their own cousins so what is the point in saying this, you have a history book at hand and can read it in print from the various biographies of the very kings and queens of Western Europe that were the ones that were harsh not only on commoners but were harsh on their own cousins.
What makes me frustrated with people like you, is the fact that most ROYALS did live the good life, deciding whom lived and whom died in their royal courts throughout most of Western Europe right from about the 900ADs right up to the 16th Century, with their Royal COUSINS being tarnished and then chased out of the Kingdom for being cousins to them, my ancestors is a case in point, you better get ready for a whole lot of people to scoff at you.
I am sorry to be rude, Lily but your points are pretty moot at this era where the rich are getting richer at our expense and people like me that have come from such bloodlines that I have are stuck in living day to day without our bloodines understood and much less cared about, by your very words you are saying between the lines that you are not improverished nor are you wanting much for money so get off that highhorse of yours.
Oh you don't tell them, well you sure got a strange way of keeping your bloodlines secret by comming on here and telling everyone your royal descended? I have a reason for myself telling others that I can prove my bloodlines, it is for the very fact that my ancestors were always the ones cleaning up the messes in politics and wars, also society problems that the royals left where they expected their royal cousins to act as chambermaids. Yet this gets you into another kettle of fish I think.....Royal Nobility in many eras were VERY HARSH on their own cousins so what is the point in saying this, you have a history book at hand and can read it in print from the various biographies of the very kings and queens of Western Europe that were the ones that were harsh not only on commoners but were harsh on their own cousins.
